<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: questions, answers and more questions in Kongo history Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/</link>
	<description>asking questions that lead to more questions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Isn&#8217;t this how it always starts ? &#171; shakara</title>
		<link>http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Isn&#8217;t this how it always starts ? &#171; shakara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] First of all, that&#8217;s bad translation. Bundu Dia Kongo means People of Kongo, not Congo. The difference being that Kongo is an ethnic group and a former kingdom based around the lower part of the Congo River. The Kingdom officially converted to christianity in 1491 and Kongo nationalism has that interesting tendency to express itself through messianic christian movements (here, here, here, here, here, here, here). That&#8217;s for people who haven&#8217;t read this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First of all, that&#8217;s bad translation. Bundu Dia Kongo means People of Kongo, not Congo. The difference being that Kongo is an ethnic group and a former kingdom based around the lower part of the Congo River. The Kingdom officially converted to christianity in 1491 and Kongo nationalism has that interesting tendency to express itself through messianic christian movements (here, here, here, here, here, here, here). That&#8217;s for people who haven&#8217;t read this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omodudu</title>
		<link>http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>omodudu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I am not very familiar with this stuff, I am learning. 
added to reader now..thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not very familiar with this stuff, I am learning.<br />
added to reader now..thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aflakete</title>
		<link>http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>the royal edict actually said &quot;better flawed than non-existent&quot;.
or something..
*goes on proof-reading spree*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the royal edict actually said &#8220;better flawed than non-existent&#8221;.<br />
or something..<br />
*goes on proof-reading spree*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manickam</title>
		<link>http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>manickam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shakara.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/questions-answers-and-more-questions-in-kongo-history-part-1/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>i heard that they only accepted literacy with the caveat that they would never ever proof-read, wive indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard that they only accepted literacy with the caveat that they would never ever proof-read, wive indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
