I would say that much of the problem we face is the very notion of “democracy” as an end in itself….getting our people to the level of seeing “development”, as locally defined within the Sen model, as the goal perhaps should be the challenge….

I have read both articles, my major disagreement is the assertion that the solution lies in embracing our African heritage. Being that most countries are a conglomerate of tribes and ethnic groups, exactly how does one democratically decide which group holds sway? They are not the first intellectuals to suggest we go back to our roots for a solution.

Interesting blog,

Of course it isn’t intervention “no matter how they do it” — being a notable success is one way of giving a “kiss of life” which is not an “intervention” “imposed” “top-down”. You make a grave charge against Mazrui and when questioned, you do no more than repeat his words without feelng obligation to make an argument. It’s not a good look.

I’m no fan of Ali Mazrui, but his comment that “We need an intelligent opposition to make democracy work” is rather apropos.

Yes he does have a valid point with the rah rah opposition. My issue is that he’s equally rah rah.

Mbelolo:

I’m not sure why you don’t see “foreign intervention” is Mazrui saying “giving the kiss of life to democracy in Africa could be South Africa’s biggest challenge”. Isn’t that “intervention”, no matter how they do it ?

As far as my laziness, well, i’m not a respected intellectual, am i ?

As for respected intellectuals being lazy — perhaps you should contact the author of the post on Global Voices and Mozambique and discuss his confessed laziness. Ahem!

Sharia or Die!